[Wigsat-l] GEAR - UN May Postpone Creation of New Single, Strong Women's Entity

Sophia Huyer shuyer at wigsat.org
Wed Sep 9 09:27:42 EDT 2009


from GAIN

source: WUNRN
http://www.wunrn.com

GEAR - UN Gender Equality Architecture Reform

http://gear.groupsite.com/link/go/56139742?lpx=1

UN May Postpone Creation of New Women's Body

By Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS, Sep 5 (IPS) - A coalition of over 300 international
non-governmental organisations (NGOs) is "outraged" that an impending
decision to create a new women's entity at the United Nations is being
postponed once again.

"If the General Assembly fails to act, it will send a very negative
signal to women around the world who are now beginning to engage in
national and regional reviews of the 1995 Bejing Platform for Action
for Women," says Charlotte Bunch, executive director of the Centre for
Women's Global Leadership at Rutgers University.

The proposal to set up a new gender entity, to be headed by an
under-secretary-general, was expected to be approved by the 192-member
General Assembly before it concludes its current sessions on Sep. 14.

But the longstanding proposal is now expected to be passed onto the
next session of the General Assembly beginning Sep.15 through
September 2010.

"NGOs are outraged that this would continue to be postponed," Bunch
told IPS. "No further delay is justified when no government has said
they are opposed to taking this step."

The international coalition is pursuing a global campaign for Gender
Equality Architecture Reform (GEAR) in the U.N. system.

The coalition includes Women's Environment and Development
Organisation (WEDO), Center for Women's Global Leadership,
International Planned Parenthood Association, Asia Pacific Women's
Watch, African Women's Development and Communication Network and
Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era, among others.

As part of its campaign, the coalition has been calling for the
consolidation of four existing women's U.N. entities into a single
body: the U.N. Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM); the Office of the
Special Adviser on Gender Issues; the U.N. Division for the
Advancement of Women; and the International Research and Training
Institute for the Advancement of Women (INSTRAW).

As a result, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon admits the "U.N. gender
architecture lacks a recognised driver"- and is probably in danger of
heading in different directions.
"It is fragmented. It is inadequately funded, and insufficiently
focused on country-driven demands," he complained last year.

Stephen Lewis, a co-director of AIDS-Free World and one of the
strongest advocates of the gender proposal, told IPS: "I have been
following this story with much intensity over the last 48 hours, and I
myself have spoken to several ambassadors (both from the South and the
North), to impress upon them the fact that under no circumstances can
this resolution be postponed".

He said that it would be "a terrible slap in the face to the women of
the world, a dreadful rejection of the views of the secretary-general,
and a deep blow to the credibility of the United Nations."

As things now stand, the consensus that had emerged is being sabotaged
by a consortium of countries, belligerently disruptive and
destructive, led by Cuba, Sudan, Iran and Egypt, he said.

The nation states of the U.N. overwhelmingly want to approve the
creation of the women's agency by resolution on Sep. 14, and begin the
process of a global search for an under-secretary-general, "but this
little group of malcontents is holding the world to ransom".

"They're using women as a bargaining chip in the effort to exact
concessions on governance and finance, the other prongs of the
System-Wide Coherence process. They care not one whit for the rights
and needs of the women of the world," Lewis charged.

The co-chairs of the 'UN System-Wide Coherence' process overseeing
wider changes in the world body - Ambassadors Juan Antonio
Yez-Barnuevo of Spain and Kaire M. Mbuende of Namibia - have already
recommended "that the General Assembly take action during the current
session and decide on the establishment of a composite [women's]
entity."

But its recommendation has apparently been ignored by some member
states which are pushing for the postponement.

In an appeal to member states Friday, the London-based Amnesty
International, which is part of the coalition, said it strongly
supports "the creation of the new U.N. women's organisation which we
believe could better protect women's human rights".

"But we have just heard that some U.N. member states are 'holding
hostage' the creation of this new women's organisation in exchange for
other, unrelated, U.N. reforms that also need to be agreed by the
General Assembly".

And some other states which are in favour are keeping silent, AI said.

"AI and other women's human rights defenders are outraged that the
creation of this important U.N. women's organization is part of
political horse-trading," the group said.

"We appeal to your government to instruct your diplomatic missions at
the U.N. in New York to champion the establishment next week of a new
strong U.N. organisation for women".

Bunch told IPS that this decision has been pending since consultations
in June "when we were assured that virtually all governments were
ready to move on it - and that the resolution would as usual come at
the very end of the current General Assembly session on Sep. 14."

Asked where Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stands on this issue, she
said: "The secretary-general has repeatedly said that he supports this
move." But she said that Ban "needs to put some pressure on
governments".

"The only government that we know for sure has said it should be
delayed is Egypt," she said, but pointed out that none of the others
will openly say they oppose it.

"But it's gotten bogged down as part of the System-Wide Coherence
Process (which is part of a wider reform of the U.N. system)", she
added.

Lewis told IPS, "What we have here is a direct challenge to the
authority and influence of the secretary-general and the deputy
secretary-general (Asha-Rose Migiro)."

Their reputations are directly on the line. A defeat for the
resolution would mean a defeat for the leadership of the United
Nations, he pointed out.

"It can't be allowed to happen. We know that the secretary general and
his deputy are working round the clock to rally the majority of the
General Assembly against this dismal little group of pariah states."

"They must not fail. If worse comes to worst, the resolution should be
put to a vote, and passed by an overwhelming margin," said Lewis, a
former deputy executive director of the U.N. children's agency UNICEF.

===============================================================
To contact the list administrator, or to leave the list, send an email
to: mailto:wunrn_listserve-request at lists.wunrn.com. Thank you.





_______________________________________________
Gain mailing list
Gain at lists.apcwomen.org
http://lists.apcwomen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gain


More information about the Wigsat-l mailing list